: |
' ' ' |
: |
|
|
|
: |
|
31.03.2015
014752-03-15 |
: " '
: " ; "
1. , , 15.5, 14
-11 (: ).
. , , " 15992-12-14 ('
' -)
( ),
"-1991. (" 14752-03-15, '
' ' , ' ' ).
. 2014
, .
" " 3
( ,
: ). , ,
,
13() .
.
,
. .
. ,
;
" " ;
. ,
, .
, ,
.
2.
, ,
.
" 103/82 " ' ( ) ",
" (3) 123 (1982) ( "
2205/09 ' ,
7
' (22.4.2009)). ,
.
,
.
,
. ,
( ).
( 295()
, "-1984).
, .
. ,
.
. , 295 : "
,
". , .
- . , 30
, 295() , "
" ( ). "
" ,
.
. ,
, .
3.
, 13
:
"...
, ,
() ,
, ,
()
.
".
, .
. (
" 672/06 ' ,
11 (15.1.2006), : ).
, ( "
7206/93 ' , " (2) 241, 251
(1997), : ; "
: ( ) "-1991,
?"
421 (2004); Re
T. (Abduction: Child's Objections to Return) [2000] 2 F.L.R. 192
( )).
( "
3052/99 ' , 6 (01.06.1999), : ; JR v SIR [2007] NICA 50 [2008] N.I. 252 ( )).
( " 5532/93
' , " (3) 282, 296
(1995)). ,
( , 250).
. ,
.
, , .
13 ,
13() -13(), . 13 ,
, "" .
. , 13()
, . " ",
" ".
. . ,
, .
, , . ,
,
( 13
, ;
"" 13
X v Y and Z
Police Force [2012] EWHC 2838 (Fam)), 56).
4.
13 , . , . ,
.
, ( , 13).
. , , ,
.
. .
( " 6056/93 ' ,
" (4) 197, 202 (1997) (: )).
, . '
- (Elisa Pèrez Vera)
, :
"In
addition, the Convention also provides that the child's views concerning the
essential question of its return or retention may be conclusive, provided it
has, according to the competent authorities, attained an age and degree of
maturity sufficient for its views to be taken into account. In this way, the
Convention gives children the possibility of interpreting their own interests.
Of course, this provision could prove dangerous if it were applied by means of
the direct questioning of young people who may admittedly have a clear grasp of
the situation but who may also suffer serious psychological harm if they think
they are being forced to choose between two parents. However, such a provision
is absolutely necessary given the fact that the Convention applies, ratione
personae, to all children under the age of sixteen; the fact must be
acknowledged that it would be very difficult to accept that a child of, for
example, fifteen years of age, should be returned against its will. Moreover,
as regards this particular point, all efforts to agree on a minimum age at
which the views of the child could be taken into account failed, since all the
ages suggested seemed artificial, even arbitrary. It seemed best to leave the
application of this clause to the discretion of the competent authorities"
(
30 " ).
: ,
.
, ,
. , ,
. ,
. , 16.
15 . ,
.
.
.
.
, .
. ,
. , 12
13, .
. , ( Rona Schuz, The Hague
Child Abduction Convention a Critical Analysis 323-324 (2013)).
. ,
. .
. .
,
.
. .
. , ,
. ?
?
, ? ( Central Authority of the Republic of
South Africa and Another v. B 2012 (2) SA 296 (GSJ))
, 13
. , .
, ,
. , .
.
5. ,
15.5, 14 -11 .
, .
. -11 .
,
( .
B. v. K. (Child Abduction) [1993] 1 FCR 382,
[1993] Fam Law 17; , X v Y and Z Police Force [2012] EWHC
2838 (Fam)
, State Central Authority v Hotzner (No 2) [2010] FamCa
1041).
.
. , ,
. .
. ,
. .
. ,
" " ("undue influence". Robinson v. Robinson,
983 F. Supp. 1339 (D. Colo. 1997). JR v SIR [2007] NICA 50 [2008] N.I. 252 ; ,
203-202).
, :
. ,
, .
.
"
... ,
".
" ".
,
, .
.
. " ",
" ". , ,
.
. , , -14 ,
. .
. -11
. ,
,
.
" ". ,
.
, ,
, .
, ,
. ,
.
.
, .
, .
,
. "substantial risk of physical harm"
.
.
-
, ,
, . ,
.
6.
.
. ,
13(), .
, ,
. , ,
.
: ,
,
. , ,
. ,
.
13() 13
. .
, .
,
,
. , ,
. ,
, ,
15.5. -14 .
7.
, . , ,
. , .
.
25,000 .
' :
.
' :
.
, ' .
, ' " (20.5.2015).
_________________________
, ' 077-2703333 ; , www.court.gov.il